From:	"Tim Van Holder" <tim DOT van DOT holder AT pandora DOT be>
To:	<djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Built-in bzero
Date:	Sun, 4 Nov 2001 15:03:27 +0100
Message-ID:	<000e01c16539$7a056640$797c76d5@pandora.be>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.1011104121135.18397K@is>
Importance:	Normal
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> On Sun, 4 Nov 2001, Tim Van Holder wrote:
> 
> > In the case of bzero, it looks like it expects
> >   void bzero (<anything>);
> > (i.e. only the return type (void) is 'hardcoded').
> 
> Then it sounds like a GCC bug that it complains, doesn't it?

Yup - but as DJ said (I hadn't seen his reply when I wrote mine),
they later build a prototype that apparently expects (char*, int).
In any case, I guess it's worth reporting to gcc-bugs, with an
optional feature-request for --dump-builtins.

- Raw text -