Date:	Thu, 25 Oct 2001 19:23:11 +0200 (IST)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender:	eliz AT is
To:	JT Williams <jeffw AT darwin DOT sfbr DOT org>
cc:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: _findfirst() patch (2)
In-Reply-To:	<20011025120047.B29346@kendall.sfbr.org>
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.1011025192235.11516D@is>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Thu, 25 Oct 2001, JT Williams wrote:

> I understand and accept your point about not wanting to clutter the
> diffs with formatting changes, especially when the diff is still under
> development as this one is.  But when the time comes to commit the
> changes, shouldn't we then add whatever formatting changes are required
> to bring the code into conformity with the djgpp style?

As a separate batch of changes, yes.

- Raw text -