X-Authentication-Warning:	kendall.sfbr.org: jeffw set sender to jeffw AT darwin DOT sfbr DOT org using -f
Date:	Thu, 25 Oct 2001 12:00:47 -0500
From:	JT Williams <jeffw AT darwin DOT sfbr DOT org>
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: _findfirst() patch (2)
Message-ID:	<20011025120047.B29346@kendall.sfbr.org>
Mail-Followup-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1011024104311 DOT 21151C-100000 AT is> <013901c15d41$34fae5c0$b07224d5 AT zephyr>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To:	<013901c15d41$34fae5c0$b07224d5@zephyr>; from ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr on Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 12:37:52PM +0200
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

-: > +unsigned int
-: > +_dos_findfirst(const char *name, unsigned int attr, struct _find_t *result)
-: 
-: Please in the future try to avoid gratuitous formatting changes such
-: as this one: they clutter the diffs and make them harder to review,
-: because the real changes are less visible.

I understand and accept your point about not wanting to clutter the
diffs with formatting changes, especially when the diff is still under
development as this one is.  But when the time comes to commit the
changes, shouldn't we then add whatever formatting changes are required
to bring the code into conformity with the djgpp style?  Over time,
the formatting of the djgpp sources would become more and more uniform.

- Raw text -