Subject:	Re: New perl package
From:	Tim Van Holder <tim DOT van DOT holder AT pandora DOT be>
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-Reply-To:	<1002805750.1294.105.camel@bender.falconsoft.be>
References:	<000001c14f43$87830b80$578ce0d5 AT pandora DOT be>
	<00e001c15244$0bef4b10$0a02a8c0 AT acceleron>
	<20011011133452 DOT C24442 AT libra DOT eth DOT ericsson DOT se>
	<1002805750 DOT 1294 DOT 105 DOT camel AT bender DOT falconsoft DOT be>
X-Mailer:	Evolution/0.15.99+cvs.2001.10.05.05.19 (Preview Release)
Date:	11 Oct 2001 15:44:38 +0200
Message-Id:	<1002807879.1294.111.camel@bender.falconsoft.be>
Mime-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Thu, 2001-10-11 at 15:09, Tim Van Holder wrote:
> On Thu, 2001-10-11 at 13:34, Laszlo Molnar wrote:
> > > > I'm currently uploading new source & binary packages for
> > > > perl 5.6.1 to DJ's server.
> > > The files are still in the incoming directory on DJ's server. The reason is
> > > that with Bash 2.05 I want to see if I can build Perl and instead of trying
> > > with an old verison I thought I should use the latest and could't find them
> > > on a simtel mirror.
> > 
> > Please run the test suite too. The only bash version which works for me
> > for both building and testing perl is 1.14.7.2(!).
> 
> I did.

Oh, and this was with bash 2.04.
Will see tonight or this weekend how I fare with bash 2.05 under XP :-)

- Raw text -