Date:	Tue, 02 Oct 2001 10:32:55 +0200
From:	"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender:	halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To:	sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu (Charles Sandmann)
Message-Id:	<4331-Tue02Oct2001103255+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer:	Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to:	<10110020339.AA16416@clio.rice.edu> (sandmann@clio.rice.edu)
Subject:	Re: putenv question
References:	<10110020339 DOT AA16416 AT clio DOT rice DOT edu>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> From: sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu (Charles Sandmann)
> Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2001 22:39:13 -0500 (CDT)
> 
> I don't have a posix standard, so a simple question ...
> 
> putenv in 2.03 took a const char * argument
> 
> When it was moved to the posix section in cvs it is no longer const
> When I passed the const strings "lfn=" in mntent I had to unconst
> the strings to avoid warnings.  Is it against the standard or some
> other way bad for this to be const in the headers?  Just wondering.

IIRC, the new Posix standard specifies a "char *" type for that
argument.  So we complied.

- Raw text -