delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
From: | Martin Stromberg <Martin DOT Stromberg AT epl DOT ericsson DOT se> |
Message-Id: | <200110010921.LAA18740@lws256.lu.erisoft.se> |
Subject: | Re: fixpath patch (rev 3) |
To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Date: | Mon, 1 Oct 2001 11:21:44 +0200 (MET DST) |
In-Reply-To: | <6480-Mon01Oct2001094710+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> from "Eli Zaretskii" at Oct 01, 2001 09:47:10 AM |
X-Mailer: | ELM [version 2.5 PL3] |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
Eli said: > > From: Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> > > /dev/bogus? > > Not good: there could be a real directory "/bogus" on that drive. > > "/dev/:bogus:" would be a better idea. But we already disallow /dev/ (because of Unix compatibility). Plus we already have /dev/env. In what way would /dev/bogus be different? Right, MartinS
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |