Date:	Thu, 27 Sep 2001 23:01:23 +0200
From:	"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender:	halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To:	sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu
Message-Id:	<1225-Thu27Sep2001230122+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer:	Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to:	<10109271834.AA15343@clio.rice.edu> (sandmann@clio.rice.edu)
Subject:	Re: fixpath patch (rev 2)
References:	<10109271834 DOT AA15343 AT clio DOT rice DOT edu>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> From: sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu (Charles Sandmann)
> Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 13:34:01 -0500 (CDT)
>  
> > I don't understand why do you object to the solution I proposed.  If
> > UNCs never happen in truename's result, all we pay is a bunch of
> > character comparisons.  If they do happen, we had better DTRT, even if
> > it costs one more call to truename, possibly one more call to getdisk,
> > and some character string manipulations.
> 
> I don't object to it, I'm just trying to find out when it might ever be
> used (for testing, validation).  So far we have gone 7 years without having
> the truename backup code in there at all, so I'm hard pressed to understand
> why we would need to handle all these sub-cases, and validate they actually 
> behave correctly. 

The call to getcwd didn't need this backup because getcwd never
returns a UNC.  _truename did, at least in my testing.

- Raw text -