Date:	Tue, 25 Sep 2001 21:45:58 +0300
From:	Jarkko Hietaniemi <jhi AT iki DOT fi>
To:	Tim Van Holder <tim DOT van DOT holder AT pandora DOT be>
Cc:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com, "'Eli Zaretskii'" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>,
	sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu
Subject:	Re: DJGPP & Windows 2000 weelky status report for 23-Sep-2001
Message-ID:	<20010925214558.B26240@alpha.hut.fi>
References:	<20010925104611 DOT C5B8 DOT H DOT M DOT BRAND AT hccnet DOT nl> <000301c145f1$c3ff2e00$158ce0d5 AT pandora DOT be>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To:	<000301c145f1$c3ff2e00$158ce0d5@pandora.be>; from tim.van.holder@pandora.be on Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 08:42:00PM +0200
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 08:42:00PM +0200, Tim Van Holder wrote:
> > But that is what config.guess/config.sub return. I was 
> > referring to uname.
> 
> Is there any particular reason why Perl's configure needs
> to roll its own detection?  I suspect config.guess and
> config.sub recognize more platforms than Perl currently
> does.

Perl does not use GNU configure.

> That aside, what's preventing perl from using the first
> part of uname's output (I think's that's always 'MS-DOS')?
> Or, it could do some DJGPP-specific tests (for example,
> it could test for $DJGPP and $DJDIR/djgpp.env exisiting
> and being the same file).

-- 
$jhi++; # http://www.iki.fi/jhi/
        # There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'.
        # It is 'dead'. -- Jack Cohen

- Raw text -