Date:	Tue, 25 Sep 2001 08:54:01 +0200 (IST)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender:	eliz AT is
To:	"H.Merijn Brand" <h DOT m DOT brand AT hccnet DOT nl>
cc:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com, sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu,
	Jarkko Hietaniemi <jhi AT iki DOT fi>
Subject:	Re: DJGPP & Windows 2000 weelky status report for 23-Sep-2001
In-Reply-To:	<20010924235825.D963.H.M.BRAND@hccnet.nl>
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.1010925085339.11596A-100000@is>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Tue, 25 Sep 2001, H.Merijn Brand wrote:

> > That would be different from any other x86 platform: they all use
> > i[34567]86.
> 
> These are *all* current options ? If so, perl5-porters will merge the uname
> detection from DJGPP and SCO, because they are almost the same now.

No, the i[3-7]86 is used for the CPU alone.  The full name of the
platform is i?86-pc-msdosdjgpp.  That's what the latest versions of
config.guess return for DJGPP.

- Raw text -