Date:	Fri, 21 Sep 2001 20:02:46 +0300
From:	"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender:	halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To:	Laszlo Molnar <laszlo DOT molnar AT eth DOT ericsson DOT se>
Message-Id:	<1190-Fri21Sep2001200245+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer:	Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC:	sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to:	<20010921160335.T4845@libra.eth.ericsson.se> (message from Laszlo
	Molnar on Fri, 21 Sep 2001 16:03:35 +0200)
Subject:	Re: UPX'ed image and debugger note [was Re: gcc-3.01 ...]
References:	<20010921125243 DOT K4845 AT libra DOT eth DOT ericsson DOT se> <10109211323 DOT AA16761 AT clio DOT rice DOT edu> <20010921160335 DOT T4845 AT libra DOT eth DOT ericsson DOT se>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 16:03:35 +0200
> From: Laszlo Molnar <laszlo DOT molnar AT eth DOT ericsson DOT se>
> 
> > The point of the original (too terse) note was to point out that
> > the CS:EIP plus SS:ESP signature looked possibly like UPX decompressor
> > and we needed to hack the debugger if you wanted to look at it.
> 
> Well, I do have a debugger for this purpose :-) A patched fsdb.

Can you publish the patches?  Perhaps we could add that to the
official sources.

- Raw text -