From:	sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu (Charles Sandmann)
Message-Id:	<10109211638.AA17405@clio.rice.edu>
Subject:	Re: W2K error message documentation
To:	acottrel AT ihug DOT com DOT au (Andrew Cottrell)
Date:	Fri, 21 Sep 2001 11:38:34 -0500 (CDT)
Cc:	eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il (Eli Zaretskii), djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-Reply-To:	<009801c14268$8da07620$0a02a8c0@acceleron> from "Andrew Cottrell" at Sep 21, 2001 04:42:14 PM
X-Mailer:	ELM [version 2.5 PL2]
Mime-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> When I first looked at the problem I thought it was a Make problem, but this
> was wrong. The following was what I sent out on
> djgpp-workers/2001/07/24/08:34:35:

Two days before I re-joined ... :-)

That explains why it looked familiar to Eli but I was sure I hadn't
seen those details...

Some day I'll finish testing command.com in several environments and
contrast what may not work the same. 

- Raw text -