Date:	Fri, 21 Sep 2001 12:52:43 +0200
From:	Laszlo Molnar <laszlo DOT molnar AT eth DOT ericsson DOT se>
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: UPX'ed image and debugger note [was Re: gcc-3.01 ...]
Message-ID:	<20010921125243.K4845@libra.eth.ericsson.se>
References:	<10109202219 DOT AA14923 AT clio DOT rice DOT edu> <7263-Fri21Sep2001102144+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <1001068276 DOT 15801 DOT 15 DOT camel AT bender DOT falconsoft DOT be>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.2i
In-Reply-To:	<1001068276.15801.15.camel@bender.falconsoft.be>; from tim.van.holder@pandora.be on Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 12:31:15PM +0200
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 12:31:15PM +0200, Tim Van Holder wrote:
> > If it is built with DJGPP, doesn't its memory layout violate some of
> > the assumptions in dbgcom.c and v2load.c?
> It uses a custom stub for its output files, so that is quite possible.

No, UPX does use the original djgpp stub. Just like newer versions of
DJP. The memory layout should not be a problem, page zero gets
protected after the uncompression is finished.

I'll look at the problem, if the problem is really caused by UPX. Can
anybody confirm this?

Laszlo

- Raw text -