delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Date: | Mon, 3 Sep 2001 08:53:58 +0300 (IDT) |
From: | Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> |
X-Sender: | eliz AT is |
To: | Andris Pavenis <pavenis AT lanet DOT lv> |
cc: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Subject: | Re: Preprocessor installation |
In-Reply-To: | <Pine.A41.4.05.10109030826030.26286-100000@ieva06> |
Message-ID: | <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010903085302.16484B-100000@is> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On Mon, 3 Sep 2001, Andris Pavenis wrote: > > Does "make install" in the GCC distribution install /usr/local/bin/cpp > > on Unix? I found a few programs that rely on cpp being on PATH, and I > > wonder what do GNU/Linux users do when they install GCC 3.x. > > Yes, it installs Then perhaps we should, too. Are there any problems with doing that, especially now that gcc doesn't invoke cpp by default?
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |