Date:	Fri, 24 Aug 2001 20:42:43 +0300
From:	"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender:	halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To:	Andris Pavenis <pavenis AT lanet DOT lv>
Message-Id:	<4634-Fri24Aug2001204242+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer:	Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to:	<Pine.A41.4.05.10108241840300.67980-100000@ieva06.lanet.lv>
	(message from Andris Pavenis on Fri, 24 Aug 2001 18:58:49 +0300 (WET))
Subject:	Re: gcc-3.0.1 and Win2k
References:	<Pine DOT A41 DOT 4 DOT 05 DOT 10108241840300 DOT 67980-100000 AT ieva06 DOT lanet DOT lv>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 18:58:49 +0300 (WET)
> From: Andris Pavenis <pavenis AT lanet DOT lv>
> 
> let's remove DJGPP_DJL and all it's traces from src/Makefile.inc

Fine with me, but the reason we use the script name is that we invoke
the linker directly in some cases, not through GCC.  Does anyone
remember why is this done, why don't we use GCC to link?  DJ?

- Raw text -