Date:	Fri, 24 Aug 2001 13:05:42 +0300
From:	"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender:	halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To:	pavenis AT lanet DOT lv
Message-Id:	<8011-Fri24Aug2001130541+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer:	Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to:	<3B8643C0.19077.5BA1DC@localhost> (pavenis@lanet.lv)
Subject:	Re: gcc-3.0.1 and Win2k
References:	<Pine DOT A41 DOT 4 DOT 05 DOT 10108232014050 DOT 34078-100000 AT ieva06 DOT lanet DOT lv> (message from Andris Pavenis on Thu, 23 Aug 2001 20:30:48 +0300 (WET)) <3B8643C0 DOT 19077 DOT 5BA1DC AT localhost>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> From: pavenis AT lanet DOT lv
> Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 12:08:32 +0300
> 
> Shouldn't it be more correct to use script from from the source tree:
> 	DJGPP_DJL := $(shell pwd)/$(TOP)/../../lib/djgpp.djl

I don't think so: that could mean a chicken-and-egg problem.  For
example, the script in the djlsr distribution might not work with the
version of GCC used to build the library.

Also, the above requires a pwd command, which might not be installed.
We are trying to avoid requesting any additional packages beyond the
absolute minimum.

I think the best way is to use the script which comes with the
compiler used to compile the library: it's guaranteed to work (if it
doesn't, they don't have a working installation).

- Raw text -