From:	"Mark E." <snowball3 AT bigfoot DOT com>
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Wed, 22 Aug 2001 13:59:40 -0400
MIME-Version:	1.0
Subject:	Re: rhgdb and dwarf2 oddity
Message-ID:	<3B83BACC.6705.A2BE59@localhost>
In-reply-to:	<5137-Wed22Aug2001184244+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
References:	<3B837ED5 DOT 9470 DOT 9EB9A AT localhost> (snowball3 AT bigfoot DOT com)
X-mailer:	Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> the debuggee.  If so, the equivalent sequence in GDB would be to let
> the program run to completion, then type "run" again.  This restarts
> the program with the same argv[] array as before, and the breakpoints
> you've set should still be valid.

I did this and gdb had no complaint.

> Perhaps a fixed release of Binutils could be available by the time
> GDB 5.1 is out.  (I estimate that will take at least another month.)

Sure.

Mark

- Raw text -