delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: djgpp-workers/2001/08/17/04:58:26

Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 11:56:02 +0300
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu
Message-Id: <2561-Fri17Aug2001115601+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC: acottrel AT ihug DOT com DOT au, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com, pavenis AT lanet DOT lv
In-reply-to: <10108162209.AA13700@clio.rice.edu> (sandmann@clio.rice.edu)
Subject: Re: _open.c commit? (was Re: Selector Exhaustion)
References: <10108162209 DOT AA13700 AT clio DOT rice DOT edu>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com

> From: sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu (Charles Sandmann)
> Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 17:09:40 -0500 (CDT)
> 
> Should we sit on the current selector cleanup patch or commit it also?

I think it should be committed and we should ask people to build
applications (such as Make, RHIDE, and Bash) with it and test it in a
variety of environments.

However, I'd like to see that patch changed so that plain DOS systems
aren't affected at all.  Why slow down systems which don't need that?
We already have the _windows_major variable that can be used to easily
test for whether we are on Windows, and _get_dos_version(1) can be
used for NT/W2K/XP.

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019