X-Authentication-Warning:	new-smtp1.ihug.com.au: Host p280-tnt2.syd.ihug.com.au [203.173.131.26] claimed to be acceleron
Message-ID:	<00d801c124ac$90280040$0a02a8c0@acceleron>
From:	"Andrew Cottrell" <acottrel AT ihug DOT com DOT au>
To:	<pavenis AT lanet DOT lv>, <sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu>, <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
References:	<3B791F66 DOT 22654 DOT 6DAEEC AT localhost>
Subject:	Re: Selector Exhaustion
Date:	Tue, 14 Aug 2001 20:33:29 +1000
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

> > The issue I had was that Charles patch was for Win 2K and Andris patch
was
> > for Win 98. I wanted to have the same source and executables for both
Win 98
> > and 2K.  Between the patch from Charles that was for Win 2K issues and
> > Andris and your comments about this last week I thought it best to only
> > enable the code in Charles's patch on my Win 2K box and don't enable the
> > function calls when running on my Win 98 box. I thought it was better
safe
> > than sorry.
> >
>
> Here is patch that seems to work both under Win98SE and
> WinNT 4.0+SP6 (with my test program). I added wrapper procedure
> around original direct_exec_tail() as I think it's easier to debug if
> needed.
>
> Cannot test on Win2k though.

Thanks for merging the two changes. This should help me out as I still build
code on the Win 98 box and then test it on the Win 2K box. It may take me a
few days to test it. I will let you know how I go when I try it.

Just spent the last hour reading and getting up to speed with the issues
while I was at work.

- Raw text -