Date:	Tue, 14 Aug 2001 12:06:46 +0300
From:	"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender:	halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To:	pavenis AT lanet DOT lv
Message-Id:	<1190-Tue14Aug2001120644+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer:	Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com, acottrel AT ihug DOT com DOT au
In-reply-to:	<3B7909ED.32020.19CCE6@localhost> (pavenis@lanet.lv)
Subject:	Re: Windows 2000 patch for utime.c
References:	<10108140514 DOT AA13389 AT clio DOT rice DOT edu> (sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu) <3B7909ED DOT 32020 DOT 19CCE6 AT localhost>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> From: pavenis AT lanet DOT lv
> Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 11:22:21 +0300
> 
> If we would have such variable it could be initialized only once at 
> startup.

Yes, I understand that.  But IMHO global variables should not be
introduced as a matter of habit.

> Yesterday I run into trouble when tried to call 
> _get_dos_version() in bad place inside dosexec.c.

??? What bad place is that?  dosexec.c assumes no one uses the
transfer buffer from some point on (there's a comment to thet effect
in the source), but _get_dos_version doesn't use the transfer buffer.

- Raw text -