delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Date: | Thu, 09 Aug 2001 18:30:34 +0300 |
From: | "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> |
Sender: | halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il |
To: | sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu |
Message-Id: | <3405-Thu09Aug2001183033+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> |
X-Mailer: | Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 |
CC: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
In-reply-to: | <10108091447.AA13261@clio.rice.edu> (sandmann@clio.rice.edu) |
Subject: | Re: Selector Exhaustion |
References: | <10108091447 DOT AA13261 AT clio DOT rice DOT edu> |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
> From: sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu (Charles Sandmann) > Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2001 09:47:19 -0500 (CDT) > > > I'd say post the patch and lets ask people to patch their libraries, > > rebuild as many applications which spawn other programs, such as Make, > > GCC, Emacs, and Bash, and lets test how well does it work for some > > time. > > Gotta go do real work now What, you mean this isn't the real work? ;-) > but I'll try to post it before Andrew can > try it tomorrow. One enhancement I considered was to not do anything > unless the absolute selector number is above some threshold. Yes, I agree.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |