| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| Date: | Mon, 6 Aug 2001 12:27:39 +0300 (IDT) |
| From: | Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> |
| X-Sender: | eliz AT is |
| To: | pavenis AT lanet DOT lv |
| cc: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
| Subject: | Re: Test binaries of gcc-3.0.1 20010802 (prerelease) |
| In-Reply-To: | <3B6E81AE.11304.15A42C@localhost> |
| Message-ID: | <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010806122552.24567B-100000@is> |
| MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
| Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
| Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On Mon, 6 Aug 2001 pavenis AT lanet DOT lv wrote: > > > Maybe it's would be best to put all related patches in a single place > > > to avoid need to collect then from mailing list (otherwise it's very > > > simple to forget some of them) > > > > If it would help you, I'm willing to post all of the relevant patches > > together. > > Maybe it would be best to create tag like v2_03_b in CVS and commit > related changes (so one will be able to get original 2.03 from CVS > and also current updated version). Posting current relevant changes > only tells current state as we may have something more after some > weeks. I meant to post diffs against stock v2.03, not against the CVS. If it will help you build GCC 3.0.1 with such a patched library, that is.
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |