delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
From: | "Laurynas Biveinis" <lauras AT softhome DOT net> |
Date: | Sat, 14 Jul 2001 11:57:02 +0200 |
To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Subject: | Re: Comments on GCC 3.0 distribution |
Message-ID: | <20010714115702.A264@lauras.lt> |
Mail-Followup-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
References: | <200107140508 DOT HAA14176 AT father DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se> |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
In-Reply-To: | <200107140508.HAA14176@father.ludd.luth.se> |
User-Agent: | Mutt/1.3.18i |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
> No. A symlink would have size 510 or 511 (I've forgotten which one). A 510 > size of 2048 means a DJGPP stub (the old way of simulating symlinks > for executables). > > You'd need to rebuild ln. And everything else to make programs understand symlinks. Laurynas
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |