From:	"Laurynas Biveinis" <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
Date:	Sat, 14 Jul 2001 11:57:02 +0200
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: Comments on GCC 3.0 distribution
Message-ID:	<20010714115702.A264@lauras.lt>
Mail-Followup-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
References:	<200107140508 DOT HAA14176 AT father DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<200107140508.HAA14176@father.ludd.luth.se>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.18i
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> No. A symlink would have size 510 or 511 (I've forgotten which one). A

510

> size of 2048 means a DJGPP stub (the old way of simulating symlinks
> for executables).
> 
> You'd need to rebuild ln.

And everything else to make programs understand symlinks.

Laurynas

- Raw text -