Date:	Thu, 12 Jul 2001 10:03:59 +0300 (IDT)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender:	eliz AT is
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: DJDIR Windows 2000 investigation results #1
In-Reply-To:	<200107112312.BAA06661@father.ludd.luth.se>
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.1010712100349.17050E-100000@is>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Thu, 12 Jul 2001, Martin Str|mberg wrote:

> > > I think the thinking was LFNs supported -> FAT32 supported. Thus the code.
> > 
> > Then why does _creat_new only set the FAT32 bit if the DOS version is
> > 7 or more, even in the LFN case?
> 
> Not sure. Because DOZE 7 was the first to support LFN or FAT32?
> 
> I think it was I had the _is_fat32_() in place. Then we (or I)
> realised that checking for DOZE version 7 was sufficient, perhaps?

Probably.  I think we should make _open and _creat_new consistent in
this aspect.  Perhaps after we make the decision what to do with W2K.

- Raw text -