From:	"Laurynas Biveinis" <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
Date:	Wed, 11 Jul 2001 16:36:16 +0200
To:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Cc:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: Comments on GCC 3.0 distribution
Message-ID:	<20010711163616.A291@lauras.lt>
Mail-Followup-To:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>,
	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1010708110538 DOT 24414F-100000 AT is> <20010710181253 DOT A472 AT lauras DOT lt> <1438-Tue10Jul2001222330+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<1438-Tue10Jul2001222330+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.18i
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> Yes, we have lots of Posix _POSIX_* constants, and quite a few others.
> I'm afraid that without out limits.h being included by the one which
> comes with GCC, some programs which need those constants might not
> compile.

Another poor answer, but in this case it would be ``too bad to be true'' -
too many broken platforms.


> The problem is, again, with any program which compiled with our
> stddef.h because it used some data type defined by sys/djtypes.h.  It
> could fail to compile with GCC's stddef.h.

You mean that code like
#include <stddef.h>
__dj_blah_t

will stop working?

Laurynas

- Raw text -