X-Sent:	4 Jul 2001 00:33:23 GMT
Message-ID:	<002901c10421$1423b1c0$e33e1d18@nycap.rr.com>
From:	"Matthew Conte" <matt AT conte DOT com>
To:	<djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1010703150917 DOT 19306L-100000 AT is>
Subject:	Re: malloc() problem, DJDEV 203
Date:	Tue, 3 Jul 2001 20:34:24 -0400
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2479.0006
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2479.0006
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

----- Original Message -----
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>

> If that doesn't work, I think we can safely decline anything above 2GB,
> which will avoid the signed/unsigned nuisance (inside malloc as well).

careful:  sbrk() will accept negative values.  i saw carmack do this in the
quake source (amongst other djgpp tricks... =).

regards,
matthew.

- Raw text -