From:	"Tim Van Holder" <tim DOT van DOT holder AT pandora DOT be>
To:	<djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>, "Mark E." <snowball3 AT bigfoot DOT com>
Cc:	"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Subject:	Re: Bash and extension searches
Date:	Mon, 2 Jul 2001 15:53:51 +0200
Message-ID:	<CAEGKOHJKAAFPKOCLHDIEEBACFAA.tim.van.holder@pandora.be>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Importance:	Normal
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
In-reply-to:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.1010702132834.4695C-100000@is>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> A separate question is whether we are sure what Bash does today is 
> correct.  I was under an impression that some people in this thread 
> didn't think so.  I think Tim wanted an extensionless shell script be 
> invoked in preference to a .exe program, and I'm not sure whether Bash 
> does that.
> 
From what Mark wrote, bash does, but __spawnve overrides that decision
(tacking on the .exe if it's found).

- Raw text -