Date:	Fri, 29 Jun 2001 17:38:55 +0300
From:	"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender:	halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To:	"Laurynas Biveinis" <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
Message-Id:	<968-Fri29Jun2001173854+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer:	Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to:	<20010629142627.B205@lauras.lt>
Subject:	Re: bash 2.04 build failure?
References:	<3395-Wed20Jun2001200621+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <3B3890D8 DOT 12023 DOT 1A6E91 AT localhost> <20010628184544 DOT B205 AT lauras DOT lt> <20010629142627 DOT B205 AT lauras DOT lt>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> From: "Laurynas Biveinis" <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
> Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 14:26:27 +0200
>
> Looks like I got it - it boils down to the same extension search order.
> My testcase fails because there are both conftest and conftest.exe in same
> directory. If I move out extensionless conftest outta way, it starts working.
> This is a real-life example for Eli, why current libc dosexec.c is harmful
> for bash.

I think I know there are situations when extension search gets in the
way, even without additional examples ;-)

- Raw text -