delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Date: | Fri, 29 Jun 2001 08:46:32 +0300 |
From: | "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> |
Sender: | halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il |
To: | ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se |
Message-Id: | <3405-Fri29Jun2001084631+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> |
X-Mailer: | Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 |
CC: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
In-reply-to: | <200106281919.VAA22494@father.ludd.luth.se> (message from Martin |
Str|mberg on Thu, 28 Jun 2001 21:19:13 +0200 (MET DST)) | |
Subject: | Re: bash 2.04 build failure? |
References: | <200106281919 DOT VAA22494 AT father DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se> |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
> From: Martin Str|mberg <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se> > Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 21:19:13 +0200 (MET DST) > > According to Eli Zaretskii: > > > From: Martin Str|mberg <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se> > > > Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 20:13:32 +0200 (MET DST) > > > > > > Sorry to butt in ,but are we talking about "foo" or "bash foo"? > > > > Is there a difference? > > I think so. If bash would run "foo.com" if I told it to run the shell > script "foo" (with the command "bash foo"), I'd be upset. With "bash foo" Bash is already called with the argument `foo', so it tries to invoke that as is, I think. Didn't try that, though.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |