| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| From: | Martin Str|mberg <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se> |
| Message-Id: | <200106281813.UAA22328@father.ludd.luth.se> |
| Subject: | Re: bash 2.04 build failure? |
| In-Reply-To: | <7263-Thu28Jun2001195324+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> from Eli Zaretskii at "Jun 28, 2001 07:53:24 pm" |
| To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
| Date: | Thu, 28 Jun 2001 20:13:32 +0200 (MET DST) |
| X-Mailer: | ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)] |
| MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
| Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
| Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
According to Eli Zaretskii: > DJ, what does the Cygwin port of Bash do? Or, rather, what does the > Cygwin DLL's routines do when Bash invokes them to run `foo'? Do they > search for extensions, and if so, for which ones? Sorry to butt in ,but are we talking about "foo" or "bash foo"? Right, MartinS
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |