delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Sent: | 28 Jun 2001 01:26:40 GMT |
Message-ID: | <001e01c0ff71$7ff31bc0$e33e1d18@nycap.rr.com> |
From: | "Matthew Conte" <matt AT conte DOT com> |
To: | <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com> |
References: | <Pine DOT A41 DOT 4 DOT 05 DOT 10106270853390 DOT 48870-100000 AT ieva06 DOT lanet DOT lv> <2110-Wed27Jun2001201114+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> |
Subject: | Re: gcc 3.0 released |
Date: | Wed, 27 Jun 2001 21:27:29 -0400 |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Priority: | 3 |
X-MSMail-Priority: | Normal |
X-Mailer: | Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2479.0006 |
X-MimeOLE: | Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2479.0006 |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
----- Original Message ----- From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> > Since the linker script needs to match both the compiler and the > linker (and also the library), we might have a situation in the > future, perhaps near future, that a new Binutils release will need to > modify the linker script, say, to prevent the linker from crashing at [...] maybe i'm missing the bus on this one, but shouldn't the linker script be built-in, anyway? at least it is on the other main GNU toolchain i am using right now (arm-elf). regards, matthew.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |