| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| Date: | Tue, 26 Jun 2001 16:19:48 +0300 (IDT) |
| From: | Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> |
| X-Sender: | eliz AT is |
| To: | "Mark E." <snowball3 AT bigfoot DOT com> |
| cc: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
| Subject: | Re: gcc 3.0 released |
| In-Reply-To: | <3B376547.14699.24583@localhost> |
| Message-ID: | <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010626161932.17201L-100000@is> |
| MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
| Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
| Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Mark E. wrote: > > That doesn't really answer my question. Is ignoring these section a > > clean solution or not? > > Yes it is. Then I have nothing against it. Andris, please go ahead and post the diffs.
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |