From:	"Laurynas Biveinis" <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
Date:	Sat, 23 Jun 2001 12:46:13 +0200
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: gcc 3.0 released
Message-ID:	<20010623124613.B333@lauras.lt>
Mail-Followup-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
References:	<3B334F21 DOT 5415 DOT EB76DE AT localhost> <3B3390C0 DOT 14539 DOT AB3453 AT localhost> <20010622183424 DOT A19262 AT lauras DOT lt> <3B337B1C DOT 4090402 AT lanet DOT lv> <20010622182312 DOT 4070 DOT qmail AT softhome DOT net> <2593-Sat23Jun2001111133+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<2593-Sat23Jun2001111133+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.18i
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> > In another mail you've said that GCC 3.0.1 will be released shortly.
> > FYI, everybody not on GCC mailing list - it should happen on 2001.08.01.
> 
> Do you know whether the problems which require changes in the linker
> script are planned to be fixed there?

AFAIK, they are not problems; they are features. So future versions
of GCC will have to use the same script.

Laurynas

- Raw text -