Date:	Fri, 22 Jun 2001 15:22:51 +0300
From:	"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender:	halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To:	pavenis AT lanet DOT lv
Message-Id:	<1858-Fri22Jun2001152251+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer:	Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to:	<3B334F21.5415.EB76DE@localhost> (pavenis@lanet.lv)
Subject:	Re: gcc 3.0 released
References:	<Pine DOT A41 DOT 4 DOT 05 DOT 10106220819220 DOT 51584-100000 AT ieva06 DOT lanet DOT lv> (message from Andris Pavenis on Fri, 22 Jun 2001 08:25:34 +0300 (WET)) <3B334F21 DOT 5415 DOT EB76DE AT localhost>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> From: pavenis AT lanet DOT lv
> Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 13:58:57 +0300
> 
> I'm sure having 2 incompatible files with the same name is 
> going to cause more problems rather than temporary changing the 
> name

I don't agree with this assessment of the relative dangers in the two
alternatives.

> What I suggesting is to temporary use linker script with a slightly 
> different name before djdev204.zip will be released

How is this different from uploading a fixed djdev203.zip now?

- Raw text -