From:	pavenis AT lanet DOT lv
To:	"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Date:	Fri, 22 Jun 2001 13:58:57 +0300
MIME-Version:	1.0
Subject:	Re: gcc 3.0 released
Cc:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID:	<3B334F21.5415.EB76DE@localhost>
In-reply-to:	<9003-Fri22Jun2001110259+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
References:	<Pine DOT A41 DOT 4 DOT 05 DOT 10106220819220 DOT 51584-100000 AT ieva06 DOT lanet DOT lv> (message from Andris Pavenis on Fri, 22 Jun 2001 08:25:34 +0300 (WET))
X-mailer:	Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On 22 Jun 2001, at 11:03, Eli Zaretskii wrote:

> > Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 08:25:34 +0300 (WET)
> > From: Andris Pavenis <pavenis AT lanet DOT lv>
> > 
> > True. Anyway using the same name may cause problems if one unzips
> > djdev203.zip after gcc30b.zip.
> 
> Then let's update djdev203.zip on SimTel.NET with djgpp.djl from CVS.
> Then the only users who will be left with the old linker script are
> those who already have it installed.
>
> > I'm going to install it
> > with gcc30b.zip in lib/gcc-lib/djgpp/3.0 so even if we'll have to do that
> > some more time in future there will be no need to change name any more 
> 
> Please don't.  I don't want to have one more unknown when I debug
> users' problems from across the ocean.  It is hard enough as it is.

I'm going to use a different name so it's impossible gcc will take 
incompatible one from djdev203.zip unless somebody will mess with 
specs. I'm sure having 2 incompatible files with the same name is 
going to cause more problems rather than temporary changing the 
name (up to time when we'll be able to require users to install
djdev204.zip or above).

What I suggesting is to temporary use linker script with a slightly 
different name before djdev204.zip will be released

Andris

- Raw text -