delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Date: | Wed, 20 Jun 2001 10:18:20 +0300 |
From: | "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> |
Sender: | halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il |
To: | "Tim Van Holder" <tim DOT van DOT holder AT pandora DOT be> |
Message-Id: | <1858-Wed20Jun2001101820+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> |
X-Mailer: | Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 |
CC: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
In-reply-to: | <CAEGKOHJKAAFPKOCLHDICEINCEAA.tim.van.holder@pandora.be> |
Subject: | Re: POSIX getdate() function |
References: | <CAEGKOHJKAAFPKOCLHDICEINCEAA DOT tim DOT van DOT holder AT pandora DOT be> |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
> From: "Tim Van Holder" <tim DOT van DOT holder AT pandora DOT be> > Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 22:49:34 +0200 > > I'd like to implement the POSIX getdate() function (parses a > given string using a set of possible format specs and returns > a struct tm* with the corresponding date/time), mainly because > it looks like a challenge. > > Of course, there is also the not-so-POSIX DOS getdate() function. > What is the recommended way of dealing with this? We had a similar situtaion with `gettext'. Juan Manuel Guerrero posted here a patch that was meant to resolve that (look for a message whose subject is "Patch for solving GNU/BORLAND gettext issue"); perhaps you could use the same solution for this problem.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |