Date:	Tue, 19 Jun 2001 22:23:31 +0300
From:	"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender:	halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To:	Martin Str|mberg <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Message-Id:	<2427-Tue19Jun2001222331+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer:	Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to:	<200106191900.VAA18430@father.ludd.luth.se> (message from Martin
	Str|mberg on Tue, 19 Jun 2001 21:00:10 +0200 (MET DST))
Subject:	Re: size_t and ssize_t
References:	<200106191900 DOT VAA18430 AT father DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> From: Martin Str|mberg <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
> Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 21:00:10 +0200 (MET DST)
> 
> Any particular reason for not having "#define __DJ_ssize_t
> typedef long int ssize_t"? Or even "long signed int ssize_t"?

Why, what difference will that make?

- Raw text -