From:	"Laurynas Biveinis" <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
Date:	Tue, 19 Jun 2001 20:05:01 +0200
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: gcc-3.0
Message-ID:	<20010619200501.A203@lauras.lt>
Mail-Followup-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
References:	<3B2F9C93 DOT 15611 DOT D557DF AT localhost>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<3B2F9C93.15611.D557DF@localhost>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.18i
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> scripts I used and diffs against original gcc-3.0.tar.gz
> 	http://www.ltn.lv/~pavenis/gcc30s2.zip

Thanks, and just two minor comments:

1) Patch to djgpp.h - you've made it to abort if -fPIC given. IMHO
this might be a wrong solution, if there are some packages which
assume that -fPIC is supposed to work.

2) Patch to t-djgpp - this patch would make GCC maintainers angry. Very
angry indeed - they are working to get rid of most x-*, xm-*.h, t-* files.
Any other possible solutions there? It's OK with our release, but I'm
thinking about upstream.

And thanks again :)

Laurynas

- Raw text -