delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Date: | Tue, 19 Jun 2001 12:00:05 +0300 (IDT) |
From: | Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> |
X-Sender: | eliz AT is |
To: | "Mark E." <snowball3 AT bigfoot DOT com> |
cc: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Subject: | Re: Package of libtool? |
In-Reply-To: | <3B2E4B8C.24386.476E51@localhost> |
Message-ID: | <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010619115938.7390R-100000@is> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On Mon, 18 Jun 2001, Mark E. wrote: > > that should be handled in binutils (ie add support to bfd) or gcc (ie > > disallow -fPIC for a djgpp host). > > My option is the compiler should reject -fPIC. Can't judge looking at the patch alone: is this guaranteed to be invoked only when producing native DJGPP executables? I think we shouldn't close the way to those who might want to use DJGPP to produce cross-compiled programs, or build custom executables that aren't supposed to become standard DJGPP .exe programs.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |