delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
From: | rjvdboon AT hetnet DOT nl |
To: | <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com> |
Subject: | RE: getconf v2 |
Date: | Fri, 15 Jun 2001 14:36:09 +0200 |
Message-ID: | <b8df01c0f597$c1302a80$e76897c2@hetnet.nl> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Mailer: | Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000 |
X-MimeOLE: | Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 |
Thread-Index: | AcD1l8EwusLvrWF6EdWjcABQi2b8cg== |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Please forgive me my ignorance, but the subject line says: "getconf v2". Should the executable be named getconf of getopt? If the first, then the following lines are incorrect. > fprintf(stderr, "Usage: getopt [-h] [sysvar] [pathvar path]\n"); > fprintf(stderr, "Usage: getopt sysvar\n"); Bye now, Robert
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |