delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Date: | Wed, 13 Jun 2001 14:50:11 -0400 |
Message-Id: | <200106131850.OAA03076@envy.delorie.com> |
X-Authentication-Warning: | envy.delorie.com: dj set sender to dj AT envy DOT delorie DOT com using -f |
From: | DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> |
To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
In-reply-to: | <CAEGKOHJKAAFPKOCLHDIEEDGCEAA.tim.van.holder@pandora.be> |
Subject: | Re: More POSIX.200x compliance |
References: | <CAEGKOHJKAAFPKOCLHDIEEDGCEAA DOT tim DOT van DOT holder AT pandora DOT be> |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
> Should a detailed change log for each function be listed in wc204, > or is it enough to simply list them saying that several functions > were changed slightly to comply with the new POSIX standard? There should at least be a list of functions, such as: foo, bar, grill: Slight changes to comply with POSIX.42 @findex foo @findex bar @findex grill But it isn't necessary to have a separate entry for each function.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |