From:	Martin Str|mberg <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Message-Id:	<200106101146.NAA22975@mother.ludd.luth.se>
Subject:	Re: Compiler options for djdev build
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Sun, 10 Jun 2001 13:46:43 +0200 (MEST)
In-Reply-To:	<CAEGKOHJKAAFPKOCLHDIGEAKCEAA.tim.van.holder@pandora.be> from "Tim Van Holder" at Jun 10, 2001 10:42:20 AM
X-Mailer:	ELM [version 2.5 PL2]
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

According to Tim Van Holder:
> >From what has been said, it would only break if chars, shorts or floats
> were passed to a function without a prototype.  But using a function
> without a prototype is also flagged as a warning, isn't it?  So this
> shouldnt be a problem - we're warned if there's no prototype, and if
> there is one, the compiler knows how to handle the arguments.

It also breaks when the function is defined before use, where the
definition serves as a prototype. todigit() is an example. This is
wrong.


Right,

						MartinS

- Raw text -