Mail Archives: djgpp-workers/2001/06/05/16:51:33
FYI for those of you playing with the latest binutils.
------- Start of forwarded message -------
Mailing-List: contact binutils-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:binutils-unsubscribe-dj-ml=delorie DOT com AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:binutils-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/>
List-Post: <mailto:binutils AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:binutils-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: binutils-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
To: binutils AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Cc: gcc AT gcc DOT gnu DOT org
Subject: 2.11.1
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_-860142670P";
micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2001 21:45:53 +0100
From: Philip Blundell <philb AT gnu DOT org>
- --==_Exmh_-860142670P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
It would be pretty bad form to allow GCC 3.0 to ship before the next release
of binutils. I'm tentatively planning to make a 2.11.1 release (from the
branch, obviously) in a week's time.
As ever, please test the branch on your favourite targets. If anybody knows
of outstanding issues that need to be addressed either in binutils 2.11.1 for
its own sake, or because they are needed for GCC, speak up now.
p.
- --==_Exmh_-860142670P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 (debian)
iD8DBQE7HUUBVTLPJe9CT30RAjTaAJ0QdOOXP7tzBy0AY+Xxzs9Ss54JVQCggAEn
Aq75AP502zD2P1jAM12WWPs=
=QSQJ
- -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- --==_Exmh_-860142670P--
------- End of forwarded message -------
- Raw text -