Date:	Tue, 5 Jun 2001 08:55:00 +0300 (IDT)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender:	eliz AT is
To:	"Mark E." <snowball3 AT bigfoot DOT com>
cc:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: file append problem
In-Reply-To:	<3B1C2D60.31887.5DA06F@localhost>
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.1010605085213.27602C-100000@is>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Tue, 5 Jun 2001, Mark E. wrote:

> I also wonder if the _remove_on_close member in FILE could be eliminated too 
> since that functionality duplicates the O_TEMPORARY flag.

Probably.  But we should decide what to do with this flag if someone 
calls dup or dup2 or freopen.

- Raw text -