Sender:	rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk
Message-ID:	<3B1BF60D.B4177307@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
Date:	Mon, 04 Jun 2001 21:56:45 +0100
From:	Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.17 i586)
X-Accept-Language:	de,fr
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: Fileutils 4.0 released
References:	<CAEGKOHJKAAFPKOCLHDIAEOCCDAA DOT tim DOT van DOT holder AT pandora DOT be>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Hello.

Tim Van Holder wrote:
> How about adding a recommendation (to the FAQ, or the KB, or
> wherever appropriate) that executables be compressed with UPX?
> This would have little ot no effect on the .zip file, but
> would significantly reduce the installed size of a package.
> Or is there a reason why this should not be done?

Can UPX-compressed programs with debug information be debugged using gdb?
Can you get a traceback using symify? Or handled using other binutils
programs? Does the UPX stub cause problems like PMODE/DJ does? If all
these work OK with UPX, then IMHO it sounds like a good plan to use UPX.

Bye, Rich =]

-- 
Richard Dawe
http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/

- Raw text -