delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
From: | "Tim Van Holder" <tim DOT van DOT holder AT pandora DOT be> |
To: | <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com> |
Subject: | Re: Fileutils 4.0 released |
Date: | Mon, 4 Jun 2001 19:00:09 +0200 |
Message-ID: | <CAEGKOHJKAAFPKOCLHDIAEOCCDAA.tim.van.holder@pandora.be> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Priority: | 3 (Normal) |
X-MSMail-Priority: | Normal |
X-Mailer: | Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) |
In-Reply-To: | <20010604092938.A11662@kendall.sfbr.org> |
X-MimeOLE: | Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 |
Importance: | Normal |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
> -: I've uploaded the release version of Fileutils 4.0 here: > > Have the binaries in fil40b.zip been stripped? > (The binary distro is extremely large; more than > twice the size of fil316b.zip.) > How about adding a recommendation (to the FAQ, or the KB, or wherever appropriate) that executables be compressed with UPX? This would have little ot no effect on the .zip file, but would significantly reduce the installed size of a package. Or is there a reason why this should not be done?
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |