Sender:	rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk
Message-ID:	<3B13FA9A.52CE563B@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
Date:	Tue, 29 May 2001 20:38:02 +0100
From:	Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.17 i586)
X-Accept-Language:	de,fr
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: confstr implementation
References:	<3B11464B DOT 31331 DOT D7FED AT localhost> (snowball3 AT bigfoot DOT com) <3B12760D DOT 23812 DOT 119949F AT localhost>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Hello.

"Mark E." wrote:
> BTW, one problem I just noticed in the Posix draft is that confstr()
> names the symbol '_CS_PATH', while in unistd.h it names the symbol
> '_CS_POSIX_PATH'.

Is the POSIX draft you refer to (the April 2001) the new POSIX that is
being developed jointly by the Open Group & ISO - the Austin Group? It
sounds like you should file a bug report about this. I did follow the
mailing list for a while - they have some bugtracking system called
Aardvark. I can't remember whether you need to be a member or not to use
it, but the answer probably lies here:

    http://www.opengroup.org/

I suspect you will have to create an account (which is free).

Bye, Rich =]

-- 
Richard Dawe
http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/

- Raw text -