From:	pavenis AT lanet DOT lv
To:	"Norberto Alfredo Bensa" <ceo AT nbensacomputers DOT com>,
	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Mon, 28 May 2001 13:06:21 +0300
MIME-Version:	1.0
Subject:	Re: gcc 2.95.3 can't built itself?
Message-ID:	<3B124D4D.27159.ABA924@localhost>
In-reply-to:	<02de01c0e748$e9bfda20$0100a8c0@fibertel.com.ar>
X-mailer:	Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On 28 May 2001, at 4:36, Norberto Alfredo Bensa wrote:

> >
> > Haven't met anything similar however I used binutils-2.9.1 (not 2.11) to
> > build gcc-2.95.3 for DJGPP (otherwise -mno-bnu210 would be useless
> > as I should get gcc binaries incompatible with binutils 2.[89].*)
> >
> > One more difference is that I build gcc-2.95.3 for DJGPP under Linux
> > (native building is less tested this time but it worked for me at least
> > once)
> >
> > I suggest to rerun stage3 after adding -save-temps to CFLAGS and
> > inspect assembler output near failure
> >
> 
> Ok, how do I rerun stage3? build.bat does the whole process again...
> 

Then look what's inside build.bat ... (it simply calls bash script 
djbuild1.sh with corresponding parameters)

Andris

- Raw text -