Date:	Mon, 21 May 2001 06:32:52 +0300
From:	"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender:	halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To:	Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
Message-Id:	<8011-Mon21May2001063252+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer:	Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to:	<3B081813.B83F96D3@phekda.freeserve.co.uk> (message from Richard
	Dawe on Sun, 20 May 2001 20:16:36 +0100)
Subject:	Re: snprintf?
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1010520182619 DOT 23429H-100000 AT is> <3B081813 DOT B83F96D3 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> Date: Sun, 20 May 2001 20:16:36 +0100
> From: Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
> 
> Anyhow, please find below a diff against latest CVS sources with these
> changes.
> 
> The new width tests are at the end of tests/libc/ansi/stdio/tsnprtf.c; the
> _doprntf() fail test is tests/libc/ansi/stdio/tsnprtf2.c. I also made
> vsnprintf() zero the FILE structure before filling it in.
> 
> OK to commit?

Yes.  Thanks.

- Raw text -