Sender:	rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk
Message-ID:	<3B07A1CE.9A453342@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
Date:	Sun, 20 May 2001 11:51:58 +0100
From:	Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.17 i586)
X-Accept-Language:	de,fr
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: snprintf?
References:	<3AF7358B DOT 19349 DOT 38937B AT localhost> <3AF7F5C9 DOT 2579 DOT B706AF AT localhost> <7704-Fri11May2001131837+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Hello.

Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> After reading the discussions we had, there are a couple of minor
> issues that I'd like to see resolved:
> 
>   - test the case of n = 1 in the test program;

This is already handled in the patch snprintf-20001119.diff, which I
included in a mail called "snprintf() diff, take 4?", sent on 2000-11-19:

    /* Try writing to a 1 byte buffer */
    snprintf(holder, sizeof(holder), "%s", BIG);
    i = snprintf(holder, 1, "%s", BIG);

    if ((i < 0) || (*holder != '\0'))
      {
        fprintf (stderr, "FAILED termination only\n");
        exit (1);
      }

>   - test the case of errors in format conversions (anything that
>     causes _doprnt return -1).

I've looked at the _doprnt() code and I am unsure how to force a format
conversion error. Any suggestions?

I just added a couple of tests for padding & precision specifiers and
that's turned up a couple of problems that I haven't investigated yet. 

> Other than that, I think the last version posted can go in.

Great!

Thanks, bye, Rich =]

-- 
Richard Dawe
http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/

- Raw text -