delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
From: | "Mark E." <snowball3 AT bigfoot DOT com> |
To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Date: | Fri, 18 May 2001 21:53:45 -0400 |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Subject: | Re: Possible bash issue |
Message-ID: | <3B0599E9.21329.13FC05@localhost> |
In-reply-to: | <CAEGKOHJKAAFPKOCLHDIMEFPCDAA.tim.van.holder@pandora.be> |
X-mailer: | Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c) |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
> So is this likely to be a bug in bash, or a libc problem (my > bash is linked against stock 2.03)? I made the example stand-alone (by providing a script that performs the same function as --fallback-echo) and I couldn't reproduce the problem. I changed to a previous bash 2.04 and also got the same answer. bash 2.05 also gives the same answer. I added a statement to output the i variable and it stops at 16 every time (2.04 current, 2.04 previous, 2.05 alpha). I also manually ran 'ltconfig ltmain.sh' and it gave the same answer. You might try disabling the memory leak fix in execute_cmd.c (search for 'free (args)') and see if that makes a difference. Mark
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |